Lost & Found: Mother Emanuel, Charleston, SC
|Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church|
Ethel Lee Lance
Reverend DePayne Middleton-Doctor
Reverend Clementa C. Pinckney
Senior Pastor at Emanuel AME
Reverend Dr. Daniel Lee Simmons Sr.
Reverend Sharonda Coleman-Singleton
"Witnesses said Mr. Roof sat with church members
for an hour and then started venting against
African-Americans and opened fire on the group."
African-Americans and opened fire on the group."
The New York Times (18 June 2015)
The existential question of who is black has been answered in the most concussive way possible: the nine men and women slain as they prayed last night at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, in Charleston, South Carolina, were black. The people for whom this new tableau of horror is most rooted in American history are black as well. The people whose grief and outrage over this will inevitably be diminished with irrelevant references to intra-racial homicide are black people. There are other, more pertinent questions, not all of them answerable. The most immediate: Who did this? Was it the act of an individual or was it an organized effort? What motivates someone to commit such monstrous acts and how do they rationalize such evil? How much longer can we live like this?Murders in Charleston, The New Yorker (18 June 2015)
As a matter of morality, the actions of Dylann Roof, who confessed to the murders, may be a conundrum, but his motivations are far from inscrutable.
The Patriot Act [Public Law 107-56, 115 STAT. 272, Section 802(5)] defines “domestic terrorism” as activities that:
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
At a minimum, the murders were intended to intimidate and coerce the black civilian population of Charleston, and beyond. A friend of Roof’s said that he had talked about wanting to start a “race war”—something that Roof also reportedly confessed to investigators. And he apparently based his acts on vintage rationalizations for terrorist violence in American history.Terrorism in Charleston, The New Yorker (29 June 2015)
Charleston Police Chief
It is unfathomable that somebody in today’s society would walk into a church while they are having a prayer meeting and take their lives.Greg Mullen
Nine Killed in Shooting at Black Church in Charleston, The New York Times (17 June 2015)
Charleston Church Shooting, The Daily Show (18 June 2015)
Eight of [Reverend Clementa Pinckney's] church members who might be alive if he had expressly allowed members to carry handguns in church are dead.N.R.A. Board Member Deletes Criticism of Victim in Church Massacre, The New York Times (19 June 2015)
There has been debate about South Carolina and the role and relation of the Confederacy (of which South Carolina was a part), the Confederate flag and racism in these nine murders.
On Monday 22 June 2015, South Carolina's Governor, Nikki R. Haley, called for the state legislature to debate removing the Confederate flag from the statehouse grounds, where it has flown since 1961, placed there to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the Civil War.
Governor Haley (at 3:55) remarked:
For many people in our state, the flag stands for traditions that are noble: traditions of history, of heritage and of ancestry. The hate-filled murderer who massacred our brothers and sisters in Charleston has a sick and twisted view of the flag. In no way does he reflect the people in our state who respect and in many ways revere it. Those South Carolinians view the flag as a symbol of respect, integrity and duty. They also see it as a memorial: a way to honor ancestors who came to the service of their state during a time of conflict. That is not hate nor is it racism.
At the same time, for many others in South Carolina, the flag is a deeply offensive symbol of a brutally oppressive past.
As a state, we can survive and indeed we can thrive, as we have done, while still being home to both of those view points. We do not need to declare a winner and a loser here. We respect freedom of expression. And for those who wish to show their respect for the flag on their private property, no one will stand in your way.
But, the statehouse is different. And the events of this past week call upon us to look at this in a different way.
Fifteen years ago, after much contentious debate, South Carolina came together in a bipartisan way to move the flag from atop the capitol dome.
Today, we are here in a moment of unity in our state, without ill will, to say it's time to move the flag from the capitol grounds.
One hundred and fifty years after the end of the Civil War, the time has come. There will be some in our state who see this as a sad moment. I respect that.
But, know this: for good and for bad, whether it is on the statehouse grounds or in a museum, the flag will always be a part of the soil of South Carolina. But this is a moment in which we can say that that flag, while an integral part of our past, does not represent the future of our great state.
The murderer now locked up in Charleston said he hoped his actions would start a race war. We have an opportunity to show that not only was he wrong but that just the opposite is happening.
My hope is that by removing a symbol that divides us we can move forward as a state in harmony and we can honor the nine blessed souls who are now in heaven.
The General Assembly wraps up their year this week and as Governor I have the authority to call them back into session under extraordinary circumstances.
I have indicated to the House and Senate that if they do not take measures to make sure this debate takes place this summer, I will use that authority for the purpose of the Legislature removing the flag from the statehouse grounds.
The Cornerstone Speech
On 21 March 1861 in Savannah, Georgia, Alexander Hamilton Stephens, Vice President of the Confederate States of America, spoke on the enactment (on 11 March 1861) of the Constitution of the Confederate States, a document which vest slavery in the Confederacy's founding purpose, and the creation of the Confederacy:
The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization...The prevailing ideas entertained by [Thomas Jefferson] and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away...Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”
Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition....
With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place. He, by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system.